SMT MEENAXI C M v. THE JOINT REGISTRAR,CO-OPERATIVE (LEGAL DIVISION)
WP/17276/2017 · 2025-01-27
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14416 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14416 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3611 WP No. 17276 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 17276 OF 2017 (GM-CFA)
BETWEEN:
SMT.MEENAXI.C.M.
D/O MUTHANNA.C.G., AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.145, 3RD CROSS, RMV II STAGE, BEHIND GOWRI APARTMENT, BANGALORE-560 054. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.RAVI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE (LEGAL DIVISION), OFFICE OF JOINT REGISTRAR, ALI AKSAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052.
2.
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BANGALORE NORTH, MARGOSA, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003.
3.
M/S. SURABHI CHITS LIMITED, OFFICE AT 396, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, KHM BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, MR MANJUNATH.M.R.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3611 WP No. 17276 of 2017
4.
SMT. LAKSHMI DEVAMMA W/O NARYANSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.31, THIGALARAPET, KAMMAVARAIPET, NALAGALLI, HOSKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL-540 006.
5.
SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.31, THIGALARAPET, KAMMAVARAIPET, NALAGALLI, HOSKOTE, BANGALORE-540 006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R2;
SRI. B.G.RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. V.VIJAY SHEKAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & 5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared in person.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3611 WP No. 17276 of 2017
As could be seen form the daily order sheet, petition was listed on 24.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 27.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 22