Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144143 (ALL)

SONPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A227/3693/2025 · 2025-07-16

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40656 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3693 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sonpati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Order of I.A. No.1 of 2025 - application for amendment in the memo of writ petition 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the application. 2. In view of the facts stated in the affidavit accompaying the amendment application, the application is allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner is directed to make necessary amendment in the memo of petition during course of the day. Order on petition 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to respondent no.2 / Nayab Tahsildar, Tahsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya to decide the mutation proceeding U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code in Case Computerized No. T202004230400152 "Sonpati vs. Gurubux", which is pending before him since 18.01.2020, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 / Nayab Tahsildar, Tahsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya is directed to decide the Case Computerized No. T202004230400152 "Sonpati vs. Gurubux", U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, which is pending before him, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, expeditiously, say, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 16.7.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench