Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14413 (AP)

SANNALA RAMA THIMMA REDDI AND 2 OTHERS v. PANYAM HYMAVATHI AND ANOTHER

SA/634/2001 · 2025-01-22

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010179142001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 634/2001 Between: Sannala Rama Thimma Reddi And 2 Others ...APPELLANT AND Panyam Hymavathi And Another ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. B NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. C PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/plaintiffs under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 10.07.2001 passed in A.S.No.148 of 2000 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Allagadda, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 07.12.2000 passed in O.S.No.161 of 1996 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Allagadda. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:22.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.634 OF 2001 Date:22.01.2025 MS