2025:HHC:15789 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 253 of 2025 Date of decision : 26.5.2025. Mohinder Singh ...Petitioner. Versus Nirmal Singh & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate. For the respondents : Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Heard. 2. The petitioner has assailed the action of 3rd respondent in attaching the immovable property of the petitioner in execution of the decree of Civil Court. 3. Record reveals that the attachment has been made on the basis of order dated 15.6.2024, passed by the learned Executing Court. This order is not under challenge herein. In absence thereof, this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution will not interfere with the action 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- taken by the Revenue Officer, who has not exercised jurisdiction as a Court or Tribunal. 4. The petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it will be open to the petitioner to approach the Executing Court with his grievance against the action of 3rd respondent, which is impugned herein. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 26th May, 2025. (kck)