Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144096 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR YADAV AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/547/2025 · 2025-05-30

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33890 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 547 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaiya Lal Maurya,Kirti Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now 528 of B.N.S.S.) by the applicants with the following prayer:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of the case S.T. No. 332/2025, Crime no. 313/2024, U/s 115 (2), 352, 351 (2), 351 (3) B.N.S. and And 3 (1) (Da), 3 (1) (Dha), 3 (2) 5-A S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station - Mall, District: Lucknow, styled as State ...Vs... Vinod Kumar Yadav and others as well as impugned Charge sheet no. 01/2024 dated 3.12.2024 as contained in Annexure no. 1 to this petition." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Nitesh/Santosh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench