Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34653 Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 485 of 2025 Applicant :- Saalma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Pandey,Neeraj Kumar Baghel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A., for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. (Now U/s.529 B.N.S.S) has been preferred by the petitioners with the following main prayer:- "Wherefore, the facts reasons and circumstances mention in the petition supported with affidavit it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to exercise the power u/s 483 Cr.P.C /529 BNSS to give direction to learned Additional Principal Judge Ist, Family Court, to decide the application dated 18.03.2024 for interim maintenance in the Case no.456/11/2022 filed u/s 125 Cr.P.C Police Station-Motipur, District-Bahraich Saalma vs Liyakat Ali pending in learned Additional Principal Judge Ist Family court Bahraich in the interest of justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to decide the matter expeditiously, within the stipulated time as this court may deem fit. 4. Learned A.G.A., submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the learned Additional Principal Judge Ist, Family Court, to decide the application dated 18.03.2024 for interim maintenance in the Case no.456/11/2022 filed u/s 125 Cr.P.C Police Station-Motipur, District-Bahraich Saalma vs Liyakat Ali most expeditiously, provided there is no legal impediment affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench