Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144093 (ALL)

SMT. RAMAWATI YADAV AND ANOTHER v. U.P. COOPERATIVE FEDERATION STATION ROAD LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR, AND ANOTHER

WRIA/6629/2025 · 2025-06-10

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35188 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6629 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ramawati Yadav And Another Respondent :- U.P. Cooperative Federation Station Road Lko. Thru. Managing Director, And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Shireesh Kumar Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Vakalatnama filed today on behalf of opposite parties by Shri Birendra Prasad Singh, Advocate is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the record. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:- "(i) to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of the mandamus commanding the respondents to pay post retiral benefit i.e. Leave Encashment for 300 days and Security amount payable to husband of the petitioner no.1 to the petitioners within stipulated time fixed by the Hon'ble court with 12% interest. ii. to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide benefit of 1st, 2nd and 3rd ACP to the husband of the petitioner no.1 on competition of 10, 15 and 20 years of service from the date of his appointment and pay arrears of salary payable to husband of the petitioner no.l to the petitioners after fixing salary of the husband of the petitioner no.1 accordingly. iii. to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide benefit of recommendations of 5th and 6th Pay Commission to the husband of the petitioner no.1 and after fixing salary of husband of the petitioner no.1 accordingly pay arrears of salary payable to husband of the petitioner no.1 to the petitioners." Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated before this Court that justice would suffice if a direction is issued to the opposite party No.2/Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Federation, 32, Station Road, Lucknow to consider and redress the grievance of the petitioners by way of a reasoned and speaking order. Learned counsel for the opposite parties Shri Birendra Prasad Singh has submitted that in the matter fresh representation is required. In response, learned counsel for the petitioners says that petitioners would prefer fresh representation within 10 days from today before the opposite party No.2/Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Federation, 32, Station Road, Lucknow. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to prefer a representation afresh within a period of 10 days from today along with certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is preferred in terms of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the opposite party No.2/Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Federation, 32, Station Road, Lucknow by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 08 weeks from the date of submission of the representation. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.6.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench