Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14408 (RAJ)

KAMLESH S/O CHOTELAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4732/2025 · 2025-05-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18991] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4732/2025 Kamlesh S/o Chotelal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Radoliya Ki Dhani, Tal Aaluda, Police Station Paparda, District Dausa. (Accused Confined At Present In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4733/2025 Harkesh S/o Gyarsilal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhani Bhadoti, Tan Aaluda, Police Station Paparda, District Dausa. (Accused Confined At Present In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.12/2025 registered at Police Station-Paparda, District-Dausa for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 140(2) of BNS, 2023. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. [2025:RJ-JP:18991] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4732/2025] 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that no previous case is registered against them. Petitioner are behind the bars since 22.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Kamlesh S/o Chotelal and Harkesh S/o Gyarsilal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/137-138