IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9192 of 2025 Decided on: 3rd June, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bishan Singh …..Petitioner Versus HPSEB Limited and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned Standing Counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:- “i. That the respondents may be ordered to fix the pay of the petitioner at the factor of 15% by inviting fresh option from the petitioner and pay of the petitioner may be fixed accordingly with all consequential benefits.” 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case of the petitioner and the relief prayed for by him is squarely covered in terms of the recent decision rendered in Satish Kumar Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2. Learned counsel also submits that the representation dated 11.11.2024 (Annexure P-4) preferred by the petitioner for claiming the above relief is pending consideration with respondent No.3. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/ competent authority(s) are directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 11.11.2024 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Satish Kumar2 within a period of six weeks from today. The 2 CWP No.1558/2024, decided on 24.04.2025 3 decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 03, 2025 Judge Mukesh