Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34152 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6455 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shanti Mohan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Secondary Edu. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Singh,Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Sri Durgesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vivek Kumar Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party Nos.1,2 & 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notices to opposite party Nos.4 & 5 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 to consider the application/ representation dated 23.04.2025 of the petitioner and thereafter appoint the petitioner for the post of Clerk in the College of opposite party No.4 (Annexure No.1) in the interest of justice." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 23.04.2025 to the opposite party No.3, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 6. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has stated that he has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 7. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the District Inspector of Schools, Ayodhya taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench