Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14402 (AP)

C KRISHNAVENI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9598/2025 · 2025-04-22

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010179582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 9598/2025 Between: C Krishnaveni ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri M M M Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Saleem, learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies for respondents 2 to 5. 2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not returning the stock of non-sortex rice delivered by the petitioners on 16.04.2021 and 07.04.2021, or reduce the stock from the ePoS device, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that both the petitioners returned the non-sortex rice to the MLS point, Nellore on 16.04.2021 and 07.03.2021 (Ex.P.2). Thereafter, the 1st petitioner made 2 representations dated 30.11.2022 (Ex.P.4) and 02.10.2023 to the Joint Collector, SPSR Nellore District to do needful. The Joint Collector, in turn, addressed letter (Ex.P.5) to the 5th respondent. Even the District Collector addressed a letter (Ex.P.10) dated 08.02.2024 to the 2nd respondent - learned Commissioner. However, neither the stock was returned nor the 2nd respondent reduced from ePoS device. 4. Learned standing counsel would submit that the issue is before the 2nd respondent, and the 2nd respondent will get a decision. Learned standing counsel submitted the instructions of the District CS Manager, dated 17.04.2025. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side directing the 2nd respondent – The Commissioner, to take a decision, in pursuance of Ex.P.10 letter vide Rc.C1/34/2024, dated 08.02.2024 addressed by the learned District Collector and pass appropriate orders within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.04.2025 KA 3 55 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 9598/2025 Date: 22.04.2025 KA