Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14401 (JHR)

RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS RAJESH GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2598/2025 · 2025-07-25

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:20493 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2598 of 2025 ----- Rajesh Kumar Gupta @ Rajesh Gupta, son of Late Kishan Lal Gupta, R/o Mohalla-Bandhpara (Shanti Nagar), near Ajit Krishna Shop, Dumka, P.O. & P.S.-Dumka (Town), District- Dumka .......... Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana, South Chhota Nagpur Division, Dumka 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Santhal Pargana, Dumka 4. The Superintendent of Police, Santhal Pargana, Dumka 5. The Officer-in-charge, Dumka Town Police Station, Santhal Pargana, Dumka 6. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal 7. Sanjay kr. Jaiswal 8. Santosh Kr. Jaiswal Res. Nos. 6 to 8 are sons of Late Dukh Banjan Pd. Choudhary, R/o Village/Mohalla-Bandhpara (Shanti Nagar), P.O. & P.S.-Dumka, District-Dumka, Jharkhand .......... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Mukherjee, Advocate Ms. Sandhya Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.C. to G.A.-I ----- Order No.03 Date: 25.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner has been forced to vacate the premises in question and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Considering the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Pending interlocutory application(s) also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/