AMRIT LAL AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIB/535/2025 · 2025-07-07
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144005 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144005 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38389
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 535 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amrit Lal And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh,Manjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as also learned Additional Chief State Counsel and perused the records.
2. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to Consolidation Director/Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, the opp. Party no.2 to cancel the notification dated 26.3.2015 under Section 4 A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, in respect of Village- Firojpur, Block- Safipur Tehsil-Safipur, District- Unnao after summoning the same. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to Consolidation Director/Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, the Opp. Party No.2 to take a decision upon the application dated 7.05.2025 for cancelling the notification dated 26.03.2015 under Section 4 A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, in respect of Village- Firojpur, Block-Safipur Tehsil- Safipur, District- Unnao."
3. Taking note of the pronouncements of this Court on the issue rendered in the case(s) of Suraj Bhan vs. Director, Consolidation, Uttar Pradesh, reported in 2006 Law Suit(All) 971, Runup Gramodyog Evam Sewa Sansthan Versus State of U.P. and Others, reported in 2022 (155) RD 497 and Daswant Ram Versus Consolidation Commissioner and Others, reported in 2015 (126) RD 669, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition for the main relief sought, quoted above.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioners to prefer a detailed representation in terms of Rule 17 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954 (in short "Rules of 1954"), which shall be considered and
decided by the Authority concerned in the light of law on the subject including Rule 17 of the Rules of 1954, most expeditiously.
(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 7.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench