Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14400 (AP)

THE KOILAKUNTALA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/7788/2019 · 2025-09-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010179772019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7788/2019 Between: 1. THE KOILAKUNTALA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD, REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER C. KRISHNA MURTHY S/O C. PARVATHEESHAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC SERVICE R/O KOILAKUNTLA VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT KOIAKUNTLA TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME VELAGAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NANDYAL SUB- DIVISION - KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order Direction(s) essentially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.4 and 5 in providing necessary assistance as per the order passed by the respondent No.6 vide proceedings in R.0 No.998/2018-B, dated 16.04.2019 to recover the possession of the property bearing Plot No.230, House No.28/786-A5, N.G.O's Colony, Noonepally, Nandyal Towri, Kurnool District by the Sale Officer as illegal, arbitrary resulting in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.4 and 5 to provide necessary assistance as per the order passed by the respondent No.6 vide proceedings in R.0 No.998/2018-B, dated 16.04.2019 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARNAM RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7788 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Karnam Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conference would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 04.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7788 of 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 PSA