Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143953 (ALL)

SURENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CO OPERATIVE GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6539/2025 · 2025-06-04

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34419 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6539 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co Operative Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupama Bhadauria Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 4. 2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.1.2024, yet the entire gratuity and leave encashment has still not been paid till date. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3, then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representations along with certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 4.6.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench