Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143941 (ALL)

BEBI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSTAHAR VIBHAG LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/6631/2025 · 2025-06-10

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35179 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6631 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bebi Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pustahar Vibhag Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushal Kishore Tewari,Shakti Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:- "A. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the selection of petitioner for the post of Anganwadi Karyakatri in village Gazipur, Block - Mandhata, Tehsil - Sadar, District- Pratapgarh. B. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opp. party no.-2/District Magistrate Pratapgarh to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21-03-2025 expeditiously as possible with in stipulated time. (Annexure No.-5) C. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing thereby the opposite parties to take appropriate action for exclusion of names of illegible persons from the Merit List." Learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court has stated that justice would suffice if a direction is issued to the opposite party No.2/District Magistrate, Pratapgarh to consider and decide the representation dated 21.03.2025 by way of a reasoned and speaking order. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.2/District Magistrate, Pratapgarh to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21.03.2025 after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as Neeta Pandey, who as per averments made in the writ petition is a selected candidate and her rights would be affected if any adverse order is passed against her. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.6.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench