Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143915 (ALL)

GEETA DEVI v. LEARNED A.C.J.M. ROOM NO. 20 SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER

A483/480/2025 · 2025-06-05

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34631 Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 480 of 2025 Applicant :- Geeta Devi Opposite Party :- Learned A.C.J.M. Room No. 20 Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A., for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. (Now U/s.529 B.N.S.S) has been preferred by the petitioners with the following main prayer:- "I. Issue a suitable Writ, order or direction commanding the Learned A.C.J.M Room no.20, Sultanpur, District-Sultanpur i.e. Respondent no.1, to decide the present case Criminal Case No.2275/2019 (State v Jitendra Pandey) Case Crime No.0121/2017, U/S 504, 506 IPC P.S-Kurebhar, District-Sultanpur pending before the court of learned A.C.J.M Room No.20, Sultanpur, District-Sultanpur (hereinafter as respondent no.1) expeditiously within such period as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to decide the matter expeditiously, within the stipulated time as this court may deem fit. 4. Learned A.G.A., submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Case bearing Criminal Case No.2275/2019 (State v Jitendra Pandey) Case Crime No.0121/2017, U/S 504, 506 IPC P.S-Kurebhar, District-Sultanpur most expeditiously, provided there is no legal impediment affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench