INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK BRANCH v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR
WPMS/3077/2025 · 2025-11-06
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14391 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14391 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9784 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS 3077/2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State.
(2) Petitioner has sought enforcement of an order passed by District Magistrate, Haridwar under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. It is contended that police authorities are not cooperating in the matter, due to which actual physical possession of the secured asset could not be taken.
(3) Learned State Counsel rightly submits that instead of rushing to this Court, petitioner should have made representation to the SSP, Haridwar.
(4) Writ petition is, accordingly,
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to SSP, Haridwar within one week from today. If he makes representation within stipulated time, SSP, Haridwar shall look into the matter and take appropriate decision, as per law, within six weeks thereafter.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
6.11.2025 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.11.06 18:02:58 +05'30'
2025:UHC:9784