Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14391 (CHH)

DEVENDRA SINGH SIBBAL @ HAPPY v. SHRI ABHINASH MISHRA

CONT/408/2025 · 2025-03-26

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14516 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 408 of 2025 1 - Devendra Singh Sibbal @ Happy S/o Shri Mahendra Singh Sibbal Aged About 63 Years R/o Utsav Palace, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Applicant) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Abhinash Mishra Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, (C.G.) Nagar Nigam Head Office, Near Mahila Police Thana, Gandhi Udyan, Raipur, (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Afzal Mirza, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 26/03/2025 1. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court’s order dated 03.10.2024 passed in WPC No. 4963 of 2024. 2 2. This Court has passed the order on 03.10.2024 in WPC No. 4963 of 2024 and directed the respondents under para 6: “6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off permitting to file an appeal in the light of provisions contained in Section 403(2)(b) of the Municipal Corporation Act to the appellate committee constituted in this regard within a period of 30 days. It is expected that if such appeal is made, that may be decided in accordance with law within a further period of 120 days after hearing the stakeholder.” 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the order of this Court has not been complied with. 4. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the compliance of the order of this Hon’ble Court is under process and will be completed within 60 days. 5. Therefore, the respondents are directed to ensure the compliance of this Court’s order dated 03.10.2024 passed in WPC No. 4963 of 2024 strictly within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present contempt case stands finally disposed off. 7. However, the right of the petitioner would stands reserved to assail the subsequent order passed by the respondents in an appropriate proceeding. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima