Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38877 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6611 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jitendra Sharma And 11 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Abhinav Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 and 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that despite they being entitled for the benefit of increment on 01.01.2014, the same has still not been granted to then and hence the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit an individual representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Abhinav Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 and 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit an individual representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench