Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34172 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6616 of 2025 Petitioner :- Geeta Tiwari And 27 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Misra,Pratyush Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Devesh Chandra Pathak, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus whereby this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to command the opposite party to consider the case of the petitioners and allow them to work on the said post and pay them the salary accordingly. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus whereby this Hon'ble Court may also kindly be pleased to command the opposite party No....to regularize the petitioners on their post and pay them the arrears of salary from the date of stopping the salary.." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has requested that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority/opposite party No.3 i.e., Chief Development Officer, Ambedkar Nagar and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioners with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e., Chief Development Officer, Ambedkar Nagar ventilating their grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with them enclosing therewith the copy of their earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioners forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench