JAGDAMBA PRASAD MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS v. SHRI DEEPAK KUMAR, PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. ADDL. SECY. EDU. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CAPL/1844/2025 · 2025-07-23
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143857 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143857 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42385 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1844 of 2025 Applicant :- Jagdamba Prasad Mishra And 3 Others Opposite Party :- Shri Deepak Kumar, Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Addl. Secy. Edu. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Singh,Rajneesh Maurya Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Affidavit of compliance filed by Shri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel duly sworn by opposite party no.1- Shri Deepak Kumar, Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Additional Secretary, Education, U.P. is taken on record.
2. Heard Shri Nishchay Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ravi Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite parties.
3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to summon and punish the opposite parties for wilful and deliberate defiance of the order dated 25.10.2024 passed by the Writ Court in Writ A No.9943 of 2024.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the grievance of the applicants was not being considered by the opposite parties, therefore, they filed Writ A No.9943 of 2024 which was
disposed of on 25.10.2024 with the direction to the competent authority to take decision in the case of applicants, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order but the decision was not taken, therefore, the present contempt application has been filed.
5. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the
order of Writ Court has already been complied with by deciding the case of the applicants vide order dated 08.07.2025, therefore, the present contempt application may be dismissed.
6. Considering the submission of counsel for the parties as well as contents of affidavit of compliance filed today, it is evident that the case of the applicants has already been decided vide
order dated 08.07.2025, therefore, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties.
7. Accordingly, the present contempt application is hereby dismissed.
8. However, it is open to the applicants to seek appropriate remedy, if they are having any grievance.
Order Date :- 23.7.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench