[2025:RJ-JP:22708] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5054/2025 Suman Saran D/o Shri Om Prakash Saran, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Vpo Jaisangsar, Tehsil Sardar Shahar, Churu-331403 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Behind Nehru Palace, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 3. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment And Promotional Board), Rajasthan, Jaipur 4. The Inspector Of General Of Police, Kota Range, Kota (Chairman, Selection Board) 5. The Superintendent Of Police, Bundi, District Bundi 6. Moni Jat Wife/daughter Of Ramdayal Jat, Through Superintendent Of Police Bundi ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. s. Raghav Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 30/05/2025 1. Matter has come up on an application (1/2025) moved by and on behalf of petitioner, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Petitioner applied for the post of Constable (GD) under OBC Category and her name found place in the merit list but vide impugned order dated 17.03.2025, her appointment has been cancelled. [2025:RJ-JP:22708] (2 of 2) [CW-5054/2025] 3. Later on, it has been pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents are in the process of re-considering the cancellation ofappointment of petitioner and to grant appointment to the petitioner in her category against the vacant post but because of interim order passed in this writ petition, the exercise has not been done, hence, petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 4. Counsel appearing on behalf of State-Authorities has no objection for withdrawal of writ petition, however counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.6-Moni Jat submits that if the appointment accorded to the petitioner would adversely affect her candidature, he may be given liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 5. In view of above, the application (1/2025) is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Needless to observe that if any fresh cause of action arise to respondent No.6-Moni Jat by according appointment to petitioner, it is open for the respondent No.6 to raise her grievance by taking legal recourse. 7. It is further observed that in case, the grievance of petitioner survives and not settled at the level of respondent-State Authorities, petitioner may also file a fresh writ petition. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/275