MOHANRAJ v. State rep by its, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/1152/2025 · 2025-01-22
A D Jagadish Chandira
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14384 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14384 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.1152 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.01.2025 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.1152 of 2025 Mohanraj ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Selaiyur Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No. 446 of 2024). ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.D.Dayalan For Respondent: Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.446 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.
2. Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this court. He would submit that the petitioner has hired the car from the Zoom App and given to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1152 of 2025 one Anthoniraj and the said Anthoniraj did not return the car. He would submit that the petitioner has also paid an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.
3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that, the petitioner has hired the car viz., Maruti Swift Red colour bearing Registration No.TN-11-BE-5421 in a Zoom App and later, did not return the car. He would further submit that the petitioner has also removed the GPS in the car to prevent it to be traced and the car is not yet recovered.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, considering the facts and the submissions, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 22.01.2025 dsn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1152 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Selaiyur Police Station, Chennai District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1152 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. dsn Crl.O.P.No.1152 of 2025 22.01.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis