Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143837 (ALL)

ARYAMAN SINGH v. NAIB TEHSILDAR,TEHSIL SALON,DISTRICT PRATAPGARH AND 3 OTHERS

A227/3646/2025 · 2025-05-30

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33872 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3646 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aryaman Singh Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar,Tehsil Salon,District Pratapgarh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pravin Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. Present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "(i) to issue an appropriate order or direction under the supervisory jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court, to the opposite party No.1 Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Salon, District Raebareli to decide the case No.3368 of 2024 having computerized No.T202410580603368 "Surya Pratap Singh Vs. Aryaman Singh" under section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before him, within time bound manner." It is stated that as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the mutation proceedings, being summary in nature, ought to have been decided within 45 days if there is no dispute and if there is dispute, then the same should preferably be decided within 90 days. However, in the instant case, the proceedings for mutation are pending since September, 2024. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1-Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil- Salon, District-Pratapgarh to consider and decide Case No.3368 of 2024, Computerized No.T202410580603368 (Surya Pratap Singh Vs. Aryaman Singh), most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Vinay/- Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench