Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143835 (ALL)

SAGIRUN NISHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.

NABAIL/621/2025 · 2025-09-19

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 621 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None present on behalf of the applicant to press the applicant nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made. The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail by means of the following order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court on 03.06.2025: "1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2.This is an application seeking anticipatory bail of the applicant in Case Crime No. 55 of 2025 under Sections 125, 115(2), 191(2), 109 of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Madayganj District- Lucknow. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per the averments made in the First Information Report, it is indicated that the other co-accused were specifically assigned the role of accosting and hitting the complainant who received grievous injuries, however, in so far as the present applicant is concerned, there is a fleeting sentence that the applicant had bitten the neck. 4. It is urged that the applicant is a lady having a stable household and even the alleged statement in the First Information Report is apparently concocted and does not indicate that any specific offence has been committed by the applicant. The applicant is not at a risk of fleeing justice or is neither in a position to influence any investigation or any witness. 5. Let a counter affidavit be filed within a period of three weeks. The applicant shall have two weeks time thereafter for filing the rejoinder affidavit. 6. List this case in week commencing 22.07.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Askari Husain, Rinku Gaur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sagirun Nisha .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7.As an interim measure, it is provided that till the next date of listing in the event of arrest of the applicant- Sagirun Nishainvolved in the above-noted case crime, he shall be enlarged on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the Police Station concerned/ Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation or for discovery of any fact by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court." 3. The State has not filed any counter affidavit. 4. The learned A.G.A. could not point out any misuse of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 5. No material has come to light which may persuade this court to take a view different from the one taken by the coordinate Bench. 6. In view of above, the interim order dated 03.06.2025 is made absolute and the anticipatory bail application is allowed in terms of the aforesaid order. September 19, 2025 Ram. NABAIL No. 621 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench