HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- WP(C) No. 2843/2025 M/s Kuldeep Raj Pandoh and Sons .....Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Pawan Kr. Khajuria, Adv. vs U. T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Adv. vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 13.10.2025 01. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not mentioned all the detailed facts properly as well as legal grounds, which could be a basis in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution in a tender matter and when confronted with the deficient pleadings, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with a liberty to file afresh. 02. Dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 13.10.2025 Rakesh S. No. 199 Rakesh Kumar 2025.10.14 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document