Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10538 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 1913 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Through V.C.)
1. Mr. M.S.Pal, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. Amreen Bano, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant Vikram Kumar, S/o Raja Ram is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 01.09.2024, bearing FIR No. 0700 of 2024, registered at P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur Haridwar, District Haridwar, which was lodged against unknown person for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 310(2) and 311 of BNS, 2023.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and furthermore there is no recovery from the present applicant and have no criminal history and now the charge sheet has been filed and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. Apart from this, he argued that the other co-accused Praveen Kumar, the real brother of the present applicant has already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 11.09.2025.
5. On the other side, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State submits that the charge sheet has already been filed and, the applicant deserve for parity of the other co-accused Praveen Kumar, who was enlarged on bail on 11.09.2025.
6. After hearing the arguments of the
learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the charge sheet has already been filed, and as such, there
2025:UHC:10538 is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and furthermore the other co- accused Praveen, who is the real brother of the present applicant has already been enlarged on bail on 11.09.2025, and as such the applicant deserves the parity of other co-accused Praveen.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant “Vikram Kumar” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
26.11.2025 Nahid
2025:UHC:10538