Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8624 of 2025 Decided on: 26th May, 2025 Sunil Kumar
…..Petitioner Versus H.P. Urban Housing & Urban Development Authority .....Respondent Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. C.N. Singh, Dr. Nidhi Singh and Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocates. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Dr. Nishi Singh, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
2. Petitioner is serving in the respondent HIMUDA Department and has prayed for direction to the respondent to grant him work charge status from the date he completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits.
3.
Learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. Learned counsel for the parties further submitted that this writ petition be disposed of in terms of the directions issued in the aforesaid decision.
4. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the aforesaid
judgment, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within six weeks from today. Copy of the order so passed, be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 26, 2025 Judge rohit 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025