APHC010177862021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10225/2021 Between: 1. D. SREENIVASULU,, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMANAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. 12-1-444, ASHOK NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. B LALITHAMMA, W/O. B. RAMBABU, HOUSE WIFE, H.NO.12-3- 805/B, VIDUYUT NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10225 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent by receiving the complaint dated 12.04.2021 when it is specifically mentioned as a land dispute in the complaint and also an agreement of sale was executed in any default in terms of the agreement, the Civil Court is the proper forum but not the 2nd respondent. And called for the report from the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ananthapuramu and forcibly obtained a statement from the petitioner for refund of sale advance amount is illegal, improper and arbitrary….” 2. Heard Ms.A.Padma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10225 of 2021 Dated.19.09.2025 UPS 559