IN T 101+202 Ashwani K Smt. Navra Haryana Manageme Secretariat CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court i State of Ha following ob COCP-3049-2019 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3049- Date of decision : ani Kumar and others Versus Navraj Sandhu, IAS, Additional Chie ana and Financial Commissioner gement and Consolidation Departm tariat, Sec.17, Chandigarh and anothe AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., for respondents No.1, 2 and 5. Ms. Eliza Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Sahil Shehrawat, Advocate for the interveners/respondents N I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 25.9.2018 (Annexure P-1) passed ourt in CWP-25443-2013 titled as “As of Haryana and others”, whereby the ing observations :- “….The petitioners are allotment, which is the case also and the said i Since it is an old case authorities shall make ea 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH -2019 (O & M) sion :-29.11.2025 …..Petitioners l Chief Secretary to Government, sioner, Revenue & Disaster epartment, New Haryana Civil nother …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA . A.G., Haryana e with ocate ents No.3 and 4. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a predecessor Bench of s “Ashwani Kumar and others vs. y the same was allowed with the are also claiming alternative the prayer made in the present id issue shall also be gone into. case, it is expected that the e earnest efforts to dispose of the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.03 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document No.5 is pres compliance to the petitio refers to the of Shri La Tehsildar S particular to the Tehsilda and 1082 s father of th allotment, o already bee Sunder Sing respect of p traceable as of the said with the orig No.3 and 4, No.1299 wa and 4 on d respondents matching. COCP-3049-2019 (O & M) issue within a period of the certified copy of this o In compliance of the last order is present in person in Court. Learned counsel for the petiti liance of the abovesaid direction, the plo petitioners. Learned counsel for the respo to the Compliance Report dated 20.11.2 hri Lachhi Ram, Naib Tehsildar (M) ldar Sales, Narnaul, District Mahend ular to Annexure R-3, which is an orde ehsildar (Sale) Narnaul to submit that th 082 situated in Narnaul, District Mah of the petitioners in the year 1961. ent, on the face of it, was an inadverten y been sold by its owner i.e. the Cen er Singh s/o Shri Gian Chand on 07.11. ct of plot No.1301 as is clarified in Anne ble as in the subsequent changes that to said plot, a plot No.1299 exists, the b he original plot stated to be 1301. At this stage, learned counsel fo and 4, who are the allottees of plot No.1 99 was allotted to the predecessors-in on dated 11.9.1957. It is also disp ndents No.3 and 4 that the boundaries o 2 of 6 months from the receipt of his order.” order dated 10.11.2025, respondent petitioners submits that in non- the plots have not yet been allotted respondents No.1, 2 and 5/State 0.11.2025 filed by way of affidavit r (M), Additional Charge, Naib ahendergarh-respondent No.5; in n order dated 21.1.2020 passed by that the allotment of plots No.1081 t Mahendergarh, was made to the 961. It is submitted that the said vertent error as the said plots have e Central Government to one Shri 07.11.1958. It is submitted that in n Annexure R-4, the said plot is not that took place on the spot, in place the boundaries of which, matched nsel for the interveners/respondents t No.1299 submits that the said plot in-interest of respondents No.3 disputed by learned counsel for ries of plots No.1301 and 1299 are VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.03 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondents petitioners i other person petitioners h after a perio dismissed b Court queri approaching submits tha authorities. petitioners After the di order dated under Sectio on 03.6.200 Settlement C petitioners h Writ Petitio 30.9.2002 p case, the Wr directed tha allotment to respondent No.1081 an COCP-3049-2019 (O & M) It is accordingly submitted by ndents that even prior to the allotmen oners in the year 1961, the plots in ques persons. It is also to be noted that again oners had approached the revenue autho a period of 40 years, whereupon their app ssed by the Deputy Tehsildar (Sales) on queries to the petitioners as to why the aching the concerned authorities, learne its that during these 40 years, he was rities. However, nothing has been place oners were proceeding with their case the dismissal of their application by the dated 21.6.2001, the petitioners had filed Section 33 before the Financial Commi 3.6.2002. The revision filed by the ment Commissioner was also dismissed oners had approached this Court after 11 Petition No.25443 of 2013, thereby layin 002 passed by the Chief Settlement Com Notwithstanding the delay of th e Writ Court direction is also very ed that the case of the petitioners be con ent to the petitioners be also considered. Learned counsel for the St ndent No.5 who is present in person, s 81 and 1082, each measuring 169 squ 3 d by both learned counsel for the otment to the predecessors of the n question already stood allotted to against the allotment of 1961, the authorities on dated 04.4.2001 i.e. eir application dated 04.4.2001 was es) on dated 21.6.2001. On several hy there was a delay of 40 years in learned counsel for the petitioners e was approaching the concerned placed on record to show that the case in the intervening 40 years. by the Deputy Tehsildar (Sale) vide d filed Case Nos.21, 22, 23 of 2002 ommissioner, which was dismissed the petitioners before the Chief issed on 30.9.2002. Thereafter the ter 11 years; by way of instant Civil laying challenge to the order dated nt Commissioner. y of the petitioners in pursuing the o very clear; inasmuch it is only be considered afresh and alternative idered. he State, on instructions from rson, submits that alternative plots 9 square yards situated in Khasra VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.03 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document No.2352, a 21.01.2020 refusing to t regard to th to provide a number and learned cou dismissed. November Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-3049-2019 (O & M) 52, already stand allotted to the p .2020 (Annexure R-3). However, the ng to take possession of the said plots. It d to the issue of plot No.1301, the respo vide an alternative plot of the same mea er and that the matter is actively under co Having noted the above said fac d counsel for the petitioners, the pres ssed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh mber 29, 2025 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 4 the petitioners vide order dated the petitioners are themselves lots. It is further submitted that with respondents are ready and willing e measurement in the same Khasra nder consideration. facts, which are not disputed by e present contempt petition stands shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.03 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document