Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143751 (ALL)

DINESH KUMAR VISHWAKARMA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE EDU. RESEARCH U.P. SHASAN U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/6646/2025 · 2025-06-06

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34852 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6646 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Edu. Research U.P. Shasan U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deep Narayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard Shri Deep Narayan Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Shri Gaurav Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Shri Satyanshu Ojha, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. Vakalatnama of Satyanshu Ojha, Advocate on behalf of respondent nos. 2 & 3 is taken on record. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. There is a consensus at the bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement and order of this Court passed in the case of Ram Kishor Yadav & Another Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Agriculture Edu. And Research Lko. & 2 Others (Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC- LKO:3993), a copy of which has been filed as part of Annexure No. 9 to the petition. Accordingly taking into consideration the aforesaid consensus, the present petition is disposed of in light of the aforesaid judgment passed in the case of Ram Kishor Yadav (supra). It is provided that the petitioners would also be entitled for the benefit of the judgment of Ram Kishor Yadav (supra). Order Date :- 6.6.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench