JAMEEL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6555/2025 · 2025-05-30
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143747 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143747 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33947 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6555 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jameel Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ninnie Shrivastava,Mukul Misra,Sushma Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to pay to the petitioner the due arrears of A.C.P. granted by means of office orders dated 17.12.2020 (contained as Annexure No.2 to this writ petition) along with admissible rate of interest from due date till the date of actual payment of the same." After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent that the representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided by respondent no.2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Perused the record. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.2
i.e. The Commissioner Rural Development, Government of U.P., Lucknow within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.2 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench