PRAKASH NARAYAN SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY., AGRICULTURE, GOVT. OF U.P., LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIA/6448/2025 · 2025-06-04
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143742 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143742 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34526 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6448 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prakash Narayan Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy., Agriculture, Govt. Of U.P., Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avdhesh Kumar Pandey,Radhika Varma,Shreshth Srivastava,Siddhartha Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondent(s).
2. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, confines her prayer to a representation being preferred either to a Committee or the Head of the Department, as has been directed by this Court in Writ A No.5617 of 2024 in Re: Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava and Others vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others, 2025:AHC-LKO:30511, and prays that the said Committee or Head of the Department be directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law.
4. To the aforesaid prayer, learned Standing counsel has no objection.
5. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation for the redressal of his grievances pertaining to his grievance in the light of the judgement of this Court in the case of Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava (supra) before the competent authority. In case such a representation is submitted then the competent authority shall proceed to decide the same
by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a further period of three months from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 4.6.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench