Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143732 (ALL)

SHIV BHUSHAN UTTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DAIRY DEVELOPMENT U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/6524/2025 · 2025-06-04

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34541 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6524 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Bhushan Uttam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Dairy Development U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Dwivedi,Himanshu Kamboj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sandeep Sharma,Shanker Lal Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, Ms. Anushree Moitra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Utsav Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and Shri Shanker Lal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4. 2. No notice be issued to respondents No.5 & 6 taking in view of nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.10.2020, his retiral dues and certain other dues have still not been paid to him. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at some length, prays that in this regard he may be permitted to submit a comprehensive representation to the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievances and the respondent No.2 be directed to consider the same in accordance with law within a specified time to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. 6. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation for the redressal of his grievances pertaining to his grievance within a period of two weeks from today before the respondent No.2, who may consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with rules and shall endeavour to decide the representation by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 4.6.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench