Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143705 (ALL)

JAMSHED AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6384/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34119 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6384 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jamshed Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State- opposite party Nos.1 to 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.5 is hereby dispensed with. 3. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that he is entitled for salary on the post of Principal regularly each and every month including arrears of salary from the date of joining i.e. 31.03.2023. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that case of petitioner is squarely covered by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court passed in case of Dr. Jai Prakash Narayan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others, reported in (2014) 4 UPLBEC 2642. He further submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner is considered and decided in light of the same, expeditiously. 5. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. 6. In view thereof, this writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.4 i.e. the District Inspector of Schools, Barabanki, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents including aforesaid Full Bench judgment of this Court passed in case Dr. Jai Prakash Narain Singh (supra) in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. 7. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law and also in light of the Dr. Jai Prakash Narain Singh (supra) case, by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. 8. It is made clear that this court has not entered into merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the Competent Authority in accordance with law. 9. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench