Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4160 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30919 of 2016 Petitioner :- Umakant Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Secondary Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Bahadur Singh,Brajesh Kumar Pandey,Umesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Nayak Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Ram Nayak Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 4. Despite notice being sent to the respondent no. 3, it could not be served. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Ram Nayak Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench