Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143693 (ALL)

SARVESH ALIAS SARVESH KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/5622/2025 · 2025-07-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38712 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5622 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarvesh Alias Sarvesh Kumar And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitesh Pandey,Ashok Kumar Bajpai,Kadambani Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. C.M. Application No. Nil of 2025 - Application for amendment. 1. Considering the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to incorporate the necessary amendment in the prayer clause during the course of day. Order on petition 1. Heard Shri Ashok Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the State respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a suitable direction to the respondent no.2, Additional Commissioner Lucknow (Division), Lucknow, who has seized of the appeal preferred by the petitioner in Appeal No.C- 202410000002617. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the matter is being listed for hearing before the appellate authority and submits that it is during the pendency of the appeal proceeding that the respondents are continuing to alienate the said property. He further submits that considering the fact that his application has been rejected, his appeal ought to be decided with expedition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a suitable direction should be issued to the Additional Commissioner Lucknow (Division), Lucknow, to decide the said case with expedition. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party no.2, Additional Commissioner Lucknow (Division), Lucknow, to decide the said appeal within a period of two months in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment . 5. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he undertakes to appear on all the dates fixed and shall also submit and undertaking to that effect before the respondent no.2. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not abide by the said undertaking, the benefit of this order shall not be available to him. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 8.7.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench