W.P.(C) 7133/2022 1 $~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7133/2022 RAM LAL GAMBHIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Animesh Kumar, Mr. Nishant Kumar, Dr. Sumit Kumar, Ms. Aprajita & Mr. Shikhar Khanna, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sahana Farah with Ms. Sanna Harta, Advocates. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate. Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 10.03.2025 CM APPL. 14246/2025 1. This matter was disposed of on 04.02.2025. 2. The present application has, however, been moved by Ms. Saroj Bidawat, learned counsel for respondent UOI. 3. It has been submitted by her that on the above said date i.e. 04.02.2025, she had appeared through video conferencing and had even given her appearance in the chat box but due to some oversight or inadvertence, her appearance has not been marked in the order. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner has joined the proceedings through video conferencing and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is also present. They have no objection if the above said application is allowed and the appearance of Ms. Saroj Bidawat is recorded. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:49:53 W.P.(C) 7133/2022 2 5. Since, it seems to be a case of sheer inadvertence, the application is allowed and it is ordered that name of Ms. Saroj Bidawat be also shown as counsel for respondent of UOI in order dated 04.02.2025. 6. This order be also uploaded as corrigendum to order dated 04.02.2025 7. The application stands disposed of. 8. It, however, needs to be highlighted right here that during course of the proceeding, learned counsel for petitioner informed that though report has been given by AIIMS, as per the directions given by this Court, he is not aware about the details thereof. 9. The Registry has placed on record one envelope received from the AIIMS. The envelope has been opened up which contains the report. The opinion of Medical Board opinion reads as under:- “The patient 75 years old male was examined and relevant investigation was done. He was found to have hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation. He has severe significant Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation with significant limitation of physical activity (New York Heart Association-Grade-III)” 10. Let this medical report be also made part of the proceedings. 11. Learned counsel for DDA submits that further steps are underway in terms of the above said order dated 04.02.2025 and above report of AIIMS which they have already received. 12. No further orders or directions are required, therefore. MANOJ JAIN, J MARCH 10, 2025/sw/SS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:49:53