Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34153 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6426 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunita Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Kriashi Shiksha Evam Anusandhan Vibhag Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Tewari,Yogendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Chandra Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party Nos.1 & 5 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2, 3 & 4. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the opposite parties to make the payment of death- cum-gratuity as well as other death benefits including family pension with interest to the petitioner." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of her grievance, the petitioner has preferred representations dated 25.04.2025 and 08.05.2025 to the opposite party No.2, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, she may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Director (Administration & Monitoring), Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her annexing therewith copy of her earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of her claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench