PAPPU ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/607/2025 · 2025-06-04
Manish Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34605 Court No. - 13 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 607 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pappu Ansari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 4 and Mr. Pankaj Gupta,
learned counsel for opposite party no.5.
2. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no.6 stands dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"1. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to confiscate the illegal possession, construction and encroachment of Gata No. 333/0.0280 hectare for the last several years built up a pucca house and setting up a tin shed by Opposite Party No. 6 situated in Village-Shahpur (Nawabganj), Tehsil- Tarabganj, District-Gonda showing the land as Naveen Parti contained as Annexure No. 1 in the interest of justice.
2. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to take lawful action against the Opposite Party No. 6 for confiscate encroachment situated in Gram Sabha Land Gata No. 333/0.0280 hectare situated in Village-Shahpur (Nawabganj), Tehsil-Tarabganj, District-Gonda showing the land as Naveen Parti in the interest of justice.
3. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in favour of the petitioner......."
6. Considering aforesaid prayer, liberty is granted to petitioner to approach appropriate authorities under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of application after affording opportunity of hearing to the alleged encroacher.
7. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench