Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143623 (ALL)

KEDAR NATH VERMA v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/603/2025 · 2025-06-04

Manish Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34591 Court No. - 13 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 603 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kedar Nath Verma Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yashi Mishra,Rama Pati Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 4 and Mr. Mohan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.5. 2. Petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1) ISSUE, Writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. parties to remove the encroachment from Gata No.14 area- 0.316 hectare is recorded in the khata of abadi, Gata No.16 area- 0.38 hectare is pond (surrounded by water) and Gata No.2532 ख area is banjar land, situated in Gram Sabha-Baraunsa, Tahsil- Jaisinghpur, District- Sultanpur, in accordance with law. II) ISSUE, writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opp. Party No.02 to measure the land Gata No.14 area- 0.316 hectare is recorded in the khata of abadi, Gata No.16 area- 0.38 hectare is pond (surrounded by water) and Gata No.2532 ख area is banjar land by making the team of revenue authorities from other tahsil barring Tahsil- Jaisinghpur, District-Sultanpur. III) ISSUE, writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opp. Party No.02 to make thorough enquiry against the tahsil-authorities of Tahsil- Jaisinghpur, who have connived with the encroachers of the gram-sabha land and punish them in accordance with law. IV) ISSUE, other writ order or direction as is deemed fit and proper under the circumstances of the case." 3. The memorandum of petition does not indicate the name of any person against whom any allegation of illegal encroachment has been made. 4. In view of such a situation, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh. 5. Considering such submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh with the correct pleadings. Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench