Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143576 (ALL)

KM. FATIMA AFAQUE RIZVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDU. DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6484/2025 · 2025-06-10

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35176 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6484 of 2025 Petitioner :- Km. Fatima Afaque Rizvi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 & 2 and Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for following main reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the respondents to forthwith fix the family pension in favour of the petitioner for demise of petitioner's father and also release the amount of collective Insurance to the petitioner, within the period, stipulated by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the respondents to release the collective insurance amount of Rs. 1,20,000/-alongwith penal interest, within the prescribed time period, by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice." After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Sitapur which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 10.6.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench