SUMANA GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE DIST. RAEBARELI AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/6412/2025 · 2025-07-16
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143570 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143570 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40508-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6412 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumana Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Dist. Raebareli And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Verma,Prinsi Singh,Yogendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner had taken a loan from the opposite party-Bank and claims to have paid it, whereas the Bank's counsel says that a notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been issued and the period of 60 days stipulated therein has also been expired, now the Bank proposes to take steps under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. These are not matters to be considered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may avail other remedies as may be prescribed in law. Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench