Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143549 (ALL)

SMT. DEEPIKA YADAV v. ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTARATE KUNDA PRATAPGARH AND 4 OTHERS

A483/486/2025 · 2025-06-05

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34650 Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 486 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Deepika Yadav Opposite Party :- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistarate Kunda Pratapgarh And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Atiya Abid,Safiya Abid Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A., for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. (Now U/s.529 B.N.S.S) has been preferred by the petitioners with the following main prayer:- "(i) to direct the learned trial court i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kunda, Pratapgarh, (opposite party No.1) to expedite and conclude the Case no.468 of 2021, under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Deepika Yadav and another Vs. Dileep Yadav and others, related with Police Station Baghrai, District Pratapgarh, within a period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to decide the matter expeditiously, within the stipulated time as this court may deem fit. 4. Learned A.G.A., submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the learned trial court i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kunda, Pratapgarh, (opposite party No.1) to expedite and conclude the Case no.468 of 2021, under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Deepika Yadav and another Vs. Dileep Yadav and others, related with Police Station Baghrai, District Pratapgarh, most expeditiously, provided there is no legal impediment affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench