Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143528 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH KUMAR AMBASHT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 12 OTHERS

WRIB/524/2025 · 2025-07-02

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37085 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 524 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Ambasht Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag.S.Kaalesh,J.K. Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Anurag Srivastava Kaalesh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the State- respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has made following prayers:- "i. to issue a suitable order, direction, or writ in the nature of certiorari commanding and quash the interim order dated 10.3.2025 passed by Board of Revenue, Lucknow in revision No.REV/783/2025/Bhadohi (Sitala Prasad Upadhyaya vs. Krishna Mohan) bearing computerized case No.R2025166700783, whereby effect and operation of order dated 5/6.02.2025 passed by Tahasildar (Nyayik) Gyanpur, Bhadohi in case No.RST/3250/2016 (Badri Prasad Vs. Ram Deo) bearing Computerized case No.T-2016166762043250, has been stayed, contained as Anexure No.1 to this petition.." 3. It has been submitted that an appeal was preferred before the Board of Revenue against the order of Tehsildar dated 5/6.2.2025 wherein certain technical infirmities were noticed by the Board of Revenue due to which an interim order dated 10.3.2025 has been passed which has been assailed in the present writ petition. 4. The petitioner who is an opposite party in the said proceedings has also appeared as a caveator and confines his prayer only for a suitable direction to decide the appeal with expedition. 5. It has been submitted that in Para 458 (2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual time period of six months has been provided. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the Board of Revenue to decide the appeal, expeditiously, say within six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law in case there is no legal impediment. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the said proceedings before the Board of Revenue. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 2.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench