Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1435 (AP)

L. Ajay v. Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat, I.A.S,

CC/3283/2025 · 2026-04-15

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010590112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3283/2025 Between: 1. L. AJAY, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, BEARING HALL TICKET NO 12030531 R/O D.NO.2-10, PEDDA VEEDHI, PEDDURU (V), GARUGUBILLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHAMSHEER SINGH RAWAT I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (SERVICE), A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED.14.11.2025 VIDE I.A.1 OF 2025 IN CC.3283 OF 2025 2. SRI M T KRISHNA BABU I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. SRI PATTAN SHETTY RAVI SUBASH I A S, SECRETARY, ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ANDHRA PRADESH AT VIJAYAWADA ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents / Contemnors herein for their willful violation and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 08.11,2024 in W.P.No.11920 /2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. 1971 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to amend the cause title of the 1st Respondent by placing “Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat” in the place of “Sri Neerav Kumar Prasad” and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA 2. V.VENKATA NAGA RAJU (SC FOR APPSC) The Court made the following order: Heard Smt. Sodum Anvesha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocharla Kota, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2, and Sri V.Venkata Naga Raju, learned counsel or the 3rd respondent. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 08.11.2024 in W.P.No.11920 of 2024. 3. At the hearing, Smt. Sodum Anvesha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocharla Kota, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2, and Sri V.Venkata Naga Raju, learned counsel or the 3rd respondent, would submit that the Transport Commissioner, AP, Vijayawada, issued proceedings vide R.No.13024/11/C2/2026 dated 14.04.2026. Thereafter, the petitioner joined duty on 15.04.2026. 4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. Page 3 of 4 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 16.04.2026 SNI 116 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO:3283/2025 Date: 16.04.2026 SNI