CRM-M-33626 209 IN THE Tejinder Singh State of Harya CORAM: Present: SUMEET GO 1. Bharatiya Nag concession of 25.03.2025, re Indian Penal C Sirsa. 2. Kumar, HPS, D learned State c 3. ad-interim bai 4. Singh) has sta 33626-2025 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of Singh versus Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM Mr. Piyush Setia, Advocate for th Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryan ***** T GOEL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (f ion of anticipatory bail to the petition 25, registered for offences punishable enal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’), at Status report by way of an affidav HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, tate counsel, in the Court today, and th On 01.07.2025, the petitioner wa bail. Learned State counsel (on instr as stated that pursuant to the order da 1 NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH -M-33626-2025 ate of decision: August 01, 2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent SUMEET GOEL the petitioner. aryana. filed under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of etitioner in case FIR No.160 dated shable under Sections 406, 420 of the , at Police Station Rania, District affidavit dated 31.07.2025 of Sanjeev olice, Ellenabad has been filed by the and the same is taken on record. ner was extended the concession of n instructions from ASI Devender rder dated 01.07.2025, the petitioner ioner dent the nt of ated f the strict jeev y the n of nder ioner MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-33626 has joined in recovery of rem 5. of the record investigation recovery of re absolute, subje BNSS. 6. be read grant confined to th other incident 7. cancellation/re stipulated und sufficient caus 8. be construed to 9. August 01, 20 mahavir Whether speakin Whether reportab 33626-2025 ed investigation, but his custodial remaining amount as also to unear Having heard learned counsel fo cord; especially in view of the factum ation and his custodial interrogation of remaining amount; the interim or , subject to the conditions as enumer This order should not be treated granting petitioner indefinite protec to the FIR mentioned ibid and will cident that involves commission of an Liberty is reserved in favour of S tion/recall of this order in case the pe d under Section 482(2) of BNSS t cause. Needless to say that anything ob rued to be an opinion on the merits of Pending application(s), if any, sha , 2025 peaking/reasoned: Yes/No eportable: Yes/No 2 todial interrogating is required for unearth the entire conspiracy. sel for the parties and upon perusal actum of the petitioner having joined gation being sought primarily for rim order dated 01.07.2025 is made numerated under Section 482(2) of eated as “blanket” order. It will not protection from arrest. It shall be d will not operate in respect of any of an offence. ur of State/complainant to move for the petitioner violates any condition NSS or upon showing any other ing observed herein above shall not rits of the case. ny, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE for rusal ined for ade 2) of l not ll be any e for ition other l not MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment