PURUSHOTTAM LAL SON OF SHRI CHARAN SINGH v. ARCHNA WIFE OF BRIJESH KUMAR
CW/6116/2022 · 2025-02-21
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14349 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14349 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8063] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6116/2022 Purushottam Lal Son Of Shri Charan Singh, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Sirsauda, Ward No.24, Nagarpalika Roopwas, Tehsil And Police Station Roopwas, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Archna Wife of Brijesh Kumar, Resident Of Jatav Mohalla, Sirsauda, Ward No.24, Nagarpalika Roopwas, (Bharatpur) Presently Resident Of Achhnera Road, Plot No.3, Ward No. 49, Brijnagar, Bharatpur (Raj.)
2. The State Election Commission, Rajasthan, Iind Floor, Vikas Khand, Secretariat, Jaipur, 302005.
3. The District Election Officer Cum District Collector, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Petitioner in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 21/02/2025
1. Application (1/2024 and 2/2024) for early listing of the matter is allowed.
2. Petitioner preferred instant writ petition on 07.04.2022 for issuing a writ of quo warranto, for removal of respondent No.1 from the posts of Ward Member of Ward No.24 of the Municipality, Rupwas District Bharatpur.
3. Heard both the parties.
4. Indisputably, respondent No.1 was elected as Ward Member on 19.11.2019 and her term of five years as Ward Member has
[2025:RJ-JP:8063] (2 of 2) [CW-6116/2022] expired. In that view, issuance of writ of quo warranto has rendered infructuous.
5. For remaining relief, to take action against respondent No.1 after completion of inquiry, petitioner reserves his right to raise issue in appropriate proceedings, if occasion so arises.
6. In that view of matter, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the aforesaid liberty.
7. Prayer has not been opposed by the counsel for respondents.
8. Accordingly, in respect of principal relief for issuance of quo warranto and for other relief, writ petition is hereby disposed of as having become infructuous, with aforesaid liberty.
9. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/113