LAXMIKANT BAJPAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/4771/2025 · 2025-05-30
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143415 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143415 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33979-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4771 of 2025 Petitioner :- Laxmikant Bajpai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Tilhari,Anurudh Kumar Singh,Shubham Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court for the following main reliefs:
"i. Writ, order or direction in a nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to take immediate action on the petitioner's application dated 16.05.2025. Copy of which is annexed as Annexure no.22. ii. Writ, order or direction in a nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.3 to lodge First Information report against the named persons as mentioned in the application dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure No.22). iii. Writ, order or direction in a nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 and 3 to stop the opposite party no.9 and her associates from demolishing the house no.8 and 9 situated in Mohalla Pitambar Nagar District Unnao and to maintain the status quo. iv. Writ, order or direction in a nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 and 3 to protect the petitioner's tenancy right in house no.8 and 9 situated in Mohalla Pitambar Nagar District Unnao. v. Writ, order or direction in a nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2, 3 and 9 not to dispossess the petitioner from the rented premises in an illegal manner without due procedure of law."
3. The petitioner is having an injunction order dated 6.11.2017
against the O.S. No.103 of 2014 from the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), FTC, Unnao, but still the private opposite parties-defendants are trying to grab the property. 4. In the given circumstances, the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner is of filing an appropriate application before the court concerned for police protection. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already moved an application before the Superintendent of Police, Unnao for ensuring compliance of the order passed by the civil court. 6. It goes without saying that the Superintendent of Police, Unnao shall pass appropriate orders on the application moved by the petitioner and take appropriate action on the same, expeditiously in accordance with law. 7.
With the aforesaid, present writ petition stands disposed of. . [Brij Raj Singh,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench